Ever felt like the “court of public opinion” is a bit out of control? We see it every day on social media and in the news—public figures like Meghan Markle, local politicians or journalists getting dragged through the mud. It’s one thing to share an opinion, but it’s another thing entirely when those words start to ruin a person’s life or career. If you’ve ever wondered where the line is between “just saying what I think” and actually breaking the law, you’re looking at the battle between free speech and defamation. In South Africa, our law seeks to strike a fair balance between an individual’s right to express their views and a person’s right to their good name.
Freedom of Speech vs. Your Good Name
South Africa guarantees freedom of expression, but this right isn’t absolute. It’s defamation when someone crosses a line and makes statements that harm your good name.
What is Defamation?
Defamation is any public statement that damages another person’s reputation. It can be written, spoken, or even an image. The statement must be false and lower your standing in the eyes of reasonable people.
How Can You Fight Back?
If someone defames you, you can sue for damages (money) to compensate for the harm caused. You can also seek non-monetary remedies, such as:
- A court order declaring the statement false.
- A retraction of the defamatory statement.
- A public apology.
- The right to respond to the allegations.
Defences Against Defamation
There are defences to defamation claims, aimed at protecting free speech. These include:
- Truth and Public Interest: The statement is true and in the public’s interest to know.
- Fair Comment: The statement is an opinion, not a fact, and is based on truth.
- Privileged Occasion: The statement was made in a situation where the law allows some leeway, such as reporting a crime to the police.
Journalists Get Extra Protection
Journalists play a crucial role in society, informing the public about significant issues. To fulfil this role, they need some extra protection. In South Africa, journalists can defend themselves against defamation claims by showing they acted reasonably and carefully, even if something they published turns out to be untrue.
Reasonable and Careful: What Does it Mean?
This doesn’t mean journalists can publish anything! They must take reasonable steps to verify information before publishing it. This might involve contacting sources, checking facts, and seeking different perspectives.
A Real-Life Example:
Prince Harry successfully sued British publications that claimed he “turned his back” on the Royal Marines. These claims were later proven false, and the publications had to apologise and pay damages. This shows how journalists can be held accountable for what they publish.
Facing a Defamation Claim or Need Help Defending One?
We can help! Our legal team can advise you on your rights and options. Contact us today!
Recent Comments